Search for: All records

Infrastructure across the circumpolar Arctic is exposed to permafrost thaw hazards caused by global warming and human activity, creating the risk of damage and economic losses. However, losses are underestimated in existing literature due to incomprehensive infrastructure maps. Here, we mapped infrastructure from 0.5 m resolution satellite imagery of 285 Alaskan communities with a deep learning detection model. Combined with OpenStreetMap, we mapped a statewide Alaskan building footprint of 53 M m2 and a road network of 50,477 km. With deep learning, we expanded the OpenStreetMap building footprint by 47% statewide and 86% on discontinuous and continuous permafrost. Doubling the amount found in existing literature by using our improved map, we estimated that building and road losses due to permafrost thaw could cost Alaska $37B to $51B under the SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios, respectively. Finally, we highlight shortcomings in U.S. national risk assessments, which do not account for Alaskan permafrost hazards. 

Much of the Arctic tundra is underlain by a network of ice wedges that formed during millennia of repeated frost cracking on cold winter days and later infilling of snowmelt water. Growing ice wedges push the soil upwards, forming connected ridges on the ground surface and the ubiquitous ice-wedge polygon tundra. Melting of the top of the ice wedge causes the ground surface to collapse with the rims transforming into snow- and water-collecting troughs — a phenomenon observed at multiple sites across the Arctic tundra in a decade or less. Continued melt establishes a new drainage network only a metre or two wide and less than a half-metre deep, where a doubling of runoff and reduced surface water storage is possible without changes in precipitation. Across the Arctic, lakes are disappearing, while precipitation and river runoff are increasing. So far, the sub-metre microtopographical changes have not entered the scientific analyses encompassing regional and pan-Arctic hydrology. The data and technology are now here to quantify the network of ice wedges across large regions and, though individually small, the ice wedges add up to large numbers. What at first may appear as contradicting hydrological change (for example, shrinking lakes despite increasing precipitation) could be explained by a sudden evolution of the stream network where the new channels are narrow but bountiful: the capillaries of the Arctic tundra hydrological system. 

Ice-wedge polygon (IWP) is a landform found in landscapes underlain by permafrost. IWPs form due to the development of ice wedges, where each IWP is bounded by ice wedges. Ice wedges form due to repeated cracking of the soil during winter and by snowmelt water infiltrating into the cracks and freezing. Repeated over thousands of years, the process results in ice wedges several 10s of feet deep. The melting of the top of the ice wedge results in ground subsidence and depending how extensive the thaw is across the landscape, new ponds or lateral drainage channels form. This data collection supported an assessment of the length of the ice wedge network in the Barnard River watershed (10,540 km2), Banks Island, Canada. The data collection is derived from the pan-Arctic map of ice-wedge polygons (Witharana et al. 2023, Ice-wedge polygon detection in satellite imagery from pan-Arctic regions, Permafrost Discovery Gateway, 2001-2021. Arctic Data Center. doi:10.18739/A2KW57K57), which used Maxar satellite imagery from 2010-2020 for Banks Island. Two types of datasets are included: (1) Polyline shapefile of mapped ice wedge centerlines. This dataset was produced with an approach adopted from Ulrich, Mathias, et al. "Quantifying wedge‐ice volumes in Yedoma and thermokarst basin deposits." Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 25.3 (2014): 151-161. A buffer that represents widths at the top of ice wedges is created around each IWP. A buffer width of 5 meters was chosen, since this allowed buffers of adjacent polygons to overlap. These buffers are then skeletonized in order to trace their centerlines, which ultimately represents the network of ice-wedges that form the IWPs in a landscape. (2) Polygon shapefile of IWP coverage (as percentage of land cover within 1 kilometer (km) x 1 km rectangular grid cells) across the 10,540 km2 Bernard River Watershed, Banks Island, Canada. Code for ice-wedge centerline extraction can be found at https://github.com/PermafrostDiscoveryGateway/IW-Network-Extraction. This data collection accompanies the manuscript published in Nature Water (Liljedahl, A.K., Witharana, C., and Manos, E., 2024. The Capillaries of the Arctic Tundra. Nature Water, doi:10.1038/s44221-024-00276-9) and the geospatial data is available to view in the Permafrost Discovery Gateway. 

Climate change pressure on the Arctic permafrost is rising alarmingly, creating a decisive need to produce Pan-Arctic scale permafrost landform and thaw disturbance information from remote sensing (RS) data. Very high spatial resolution (VHSR) satellite images can be utilized to detect ice-wedge polygons (IWPs) – the most important and widespread landform in the Arctic tundra region - across the Arctic without compromising spatial details. Automated analysis of peta-byte scale VHSR imagery covering millions of square kilometers is a computationally challenging task. Traditional semantic segmentation requires the use of task specific feature extraction with conventional classification techniques. Semantic complexity of VHSR images coupled with landscape heterogeneity makes it difficult to use conventional classification approaches to produce Pan-Arctic scale geospatial products. This leads to adapting deep convolutional neural network (DLCNN) approaches that have excelled in computer vision (CV) applications. Transitioning domains from everyday image understanding to remote sensing image analysis is challenging. This study aims to systematically investigate two main obstacles confronted when adapting DLCNNs in large-scale RS image analysis tasks; 1) the limited availability labeled data sets and 2) the prohibitive nature of hyperparameter tunning when designing DLCNNs that can capture the rich characteristics embedded in remotely-sensed images. With a case study on the production of the first pan-Arctic ice-wedge polygon map using thousands of VHSR images, we demonstrate the use of transfer learning and the impact of hyperparameter tuning with a 16% improvement of the Mean Average Precision (mAP50). 

Risk assessment of infrastructure exposed to ice-rich permafrost hazards is essential for climate change adaptation in the Arctic. As this process requires up-to-date, comprehensive, high-resolution maps of human-built infrastructure, gaps in such geospatial information and knowledge of the applications required to produce it must be addressed. Therefore, this study highlights the ongoing development of a deep learning approach to efficiently map the Arctic built environment by detecting nine different types of structures (detached houses, row houses, multi-story blocks, non-residential buildings, roads, runways, gravel pads, pipelines, and storage tanks) from recently-acquired Maxar commercial satellite imagery (<1 m resolution). We conducted a multi-objective comparison, focusing on generalization performance and computational cost, of nine different semantic segmentation architectures. K-fold cross validation was used to estimate the average F1-score of each architecture and the Friedman Aligned Ranks test with the Bergmann-Hommel posthoc procedure was applied to test for significant differences in generalization performance. ResNet-50-UNet++ performs significantly better than five out of the other eight candidate architectures; no significant difference was found in the pairwise comparisons of ResNet-50-UNet++ to ResNet-50-MANet, ResNet-101-MANet, and ResNet-101-UNet++. We then conducted a high-performance computing scaling experiment to compare the number of service units and runtime required for model inferencing on a hypothetical pan- Arctic scale dataset. We found that the ResNet-50-UNet++ model could save up to ~ 54% on service unit expenditure, or ~ 18% on runtime, when considering operational deployment of our mapping approach. Our results suggest that ResNet-50-UNet++ could be the most suitable architecture (out of the nine that were examined) for deep learning-enabled Arctic infrastructure mapping efforts. Overall, our findings regarding the differences between the examined CNN architectures and our methodological framework for multi-objective architecture comparison can provide a foundation that may propel future pan-Arctic GeoAI mapping efforts of infrastructure. 

Rapid global warming is catalyzing widespread permafrost degradation in the Arctic, leading to destructive land-surface subsidence that destabilizes and deforms the ground. Consequently, human-built infrastructure constructed upon permafrost is currently at major risk of structural failure. Risk assessment frameworks that attempt to study this issue assume that precise information on the location and extent of infrastructure is known. However, complete, high-quality, uniform geospatial datasets of built infrastructure that are readily available for such scientific studies are lacking. While imagery-enabled mapping can fill this knowledge gap, the small size of individual structures and vast geographical extent of the Arctic necessitate large volumes of very high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Transforming this ‘big’ imagery data into ‘science-ready’ information demands highly automated image analysis pipelines driven by advanced computer vision algorithms. Despite this, previous fine resolution studies have been limited to manual digitization of features on locally confined scales. Therefore, this exploratory study serves as the first investigation into fully automated analysis of sub-meter spatial resolution satellite imagery for automated detection of Arctic built infrastructure. We tasked the U-Net, a deep learning-based semantic segmentation model, with classifying different infrastructure types (residential, commercial, public, and industrial buildings, as well as roads) from commercial satellite imagery of Utqiagvik and Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. We also conducted a systematic experiment to understand how image augmentation can impact model performance when labeled training data is limited. When optimal augmentation methods were applied, the U-Net achieved an average F1 score of 0.83. Overall, our experimental findings show that the U-Net-based workflow is a promising method for automated Arctic built infrastructure detection that, combined with existing optimized workflows, such as MAPLE, could be expanded to map a multitude of infrastructure types spanning the pan-Arctic. 

Retrogressive thaw slumps (RTS) are considered one of the most dynamic permafrost disturbance features in the Arctic. Sub-meter resolution multispectral imagery acquired by very high spatial resolution (VHSR) commercial satellite sensors offer unique capacities in capturing the morphological dynamics of RTSs. The central goal of this study is to develop a deep learning convolutional neural net (CNN) model (a UNet-based workflow) to automatically detect and characterize RTSs from VHSR imagery. We aimed to understand: (1) the optimal combination of input image tile size (array size) and the CNN network input size (resizing factor/spatial resolution) and (2) the interoperability of the trained UNet models across heterogeneous study sites based on a limited set of training samples. Hand annotation of RTS samples, CNN model training and testing, and interoperability analyses were based on two study areas from high-Arctic Canada: (1) Banks Island and (2) Axel Heiberg Island and Ellesmere Island. Our experimental results revealed the potential impact of image tile size and the resizing factor on the detection accuracies of the UNet model. The results from the model transferability analysis elucidate the effects on the UNet model due the variability (e.g., shape, color, and texture) associated with the RTS training samples. Overall, study findings highlight several key factors that we should consider when operationalizing CNN-based RTS mapping over large geographical extents. 

Data are available for download at http://arcticdata.io/data/10.18739/A2KW57K57 Permafrost can be indirectly detected via remote sensing techniques through the presence of ice-wedge polygons, which are a ubiquitous ground surface feature in tundra regions. Ice-wedge polygons form through repeated annual cracking of the ground during cold winter days. In spring, the cracks fill in with snowmelt water, creating ice wedges, which are connected across the landscape in an underground network and that can grow to several meters depth and width. The growing ice wedges push the soil upwards, forming ridges that bound low-centered ice-wedge polygons. If the top of the ice wedge melts, the ground subsides and the ridges become troughs and the ice-wedge polygons become high-centered. Here, a Convolutional Neural Network is used to map the boundaries of individual ice-wedge polygons based on high-resolution commercial satellite imagery obtained from the Polar Geospatial Center. This satellite imagery used for the detection of ice-wedge polygons represent years between 2001 and 2021, so this dataset represents ice-wedge polygons mapped from different years. This dataset does not include a time series (i.e. same area mapped more than once). The shapefiles are masked, reprojected, and processed into GeoPackages with calculated attributes for each ice-wedge polygon such as circumference and width. The GeoPackages are then rasterized with new calculated attributes for ice-wedge polygon coverage such a coverage density. This release represents the region classified as “high ice” by Brown et al. 1997. The dataset is available to explore on the Permafrost Discovery Gateway (PDG), an online platform that aims to make big geospatial permafrost data accessible to enable knowledge-generation by researchers and the public. The PDG project creates various pan-Arctic data products down to the sub-meter and monthly resolution. Access the PDG Imagery Viewer here: https://arcticdata.io/catalog/portals/permafrost Data limitations in use: This data is part of an initial release of the pan-Arctic data product for ice-wedge polygons, and it is expected that there are constraints on its accuracy and completeness. Users are encouraged to provide feedback regarding how they use this data and issues they encounter during post-processing. Please reach out to the dataset contact or a member of the PDG team via support@arcticdata.io.